Tragic Story of Facebook Owner Mark Zuckerberg Who Runs the Risk of Becoming Unforgivable

Tragic Story of Facebook Owner Mark Zuckerberg Who Runs the Risk of Becoming Unforgivable

Mark Zuckerberg made a name for himself as a champion of online censorship — with 3 billion Facebook subscribers, his censorship experiment is the most significant ever in human history — in fact, Mark Zuckerberg’s censorship machine is more powerful than China’s censorship machine because Facebook has twice as many followers as China’s population and is the most influential social media platform in the world.

What Happened to Mark Zuckerberg?

In his younger years, he appeared to be one of those people who wouldn’t hesitate to challenge the establishment. He is credited with the invention of Facebook, although not without major controversies related to his questionable treatment of his friends and associates who co-authored the Facebook concept with him and later sued him for stealing their ideas. At a minimum, Mark appeared to be very entrepreneurial and definitely not a socialist. He was happy that “Social Network,” a movie about him, was successful and motivated many young people to launch various startups.

How did Mark transition from being a venture capitalist and a free spirit to supporting today’s rotten socialist totalitarian democrat government that expands government control, destroys businesses, and asks Facebook to actively suppress any anti-establishment and anti-government criticism on his powerful platform?

Can’t Mark see that democrats are pro-labor and anti-business, that they are seeking to crack down on opposition the same way Putin and the Chinese politburo did in Russia and China, that the BLUE “regime” is trying to put Republicans and their leaders behind bars (something only done in banana republics in Africa or totalitarian regimes in the Middle East, Russia, or China)?

What Does Mark Zuckerberg Know That We Don’t Know That Makes Him Support the Destruction of Our Democracy?

Is he concerned that Republican control over three branches of power, or at least the presidency, could lead to a “right-wing” totalitarian regime? But during his presidency, Trump never tried to send his opponents to prison! Republicans believe in small government, not big government, and right-wing authoritarian regimes always expanded government control, not downsized the government.

Maybe Mark Zuckerberg supports Democrats because they promised him something in exchange? But he already has everything he wanted, his Meta platform is the most successful in the world. Maybe he believes that at some point he could actually start shaping our behavior and controlling our minds with his virtual Meta universe, and Democrats were the only ones who were willing to allow him to do that?

This begs the question, why does Mark Zuckerberg want to shape our behavior and control our minds?

You could probably read between the lines if you study Facebook rules and regulations, what’s on his mind. Read Facebook rules to learn how Mark Zuckerberg wants us to “behave” and not use so-called “hate speech” against “protected” groups of people.

Facebook Community Guidelines:

“We define hate speech as direct attacks against people — rather than concepts or institutions— based on what we call protected characteristics (PCs): race, ethnicity, national origin, disability, religious affiliation, caste, sexual orientation, sex, gender identity, and serious disease. Additionally, we consider age a protected characteristic when referenced along with another protected characteristic. We also protect refugees, migrants, immigrants, and asylum seekers from the most severe attacks, though we do allow commentary on and criticism of immigration policies. Similarly, we provide some protections for non-protected characteristics, such as occupation, when they are referenced along with a protected characteristic. Sometimes, based on local nuance, we consider certain words or phrases as frequently used proxies for PC groups.

We define a hate speech attack as dehumanizing speech; statements of inferiority, expressions of contempt or disgust; cursing; and calls for exclusion or segregation. We also prohibit the use of harmful stereotypes, which we define as dehumanizing comparisons that have historically been used to attack, intimidate, or exclude specific groups, and that are often linked with offline violence. We also prohibit the usage of slurs that are used to attack people on the basis of their protected characteristics. Attacks are separated into two tiers of severity, described below.”

Dangerously Naïve Mind of Mark Zuckerberg

So, in Mark Zuckerberg’s mind, there are no BAD groups of people that are evil, degenerate, inferior, that can (and should) be shamed, criticized, and excluded using so-called “hate speech.”

If this were actually true, and there are no bad groups of people in the world, and all the “hate speech” against them is a big lie, we would live in a perfect world, essentially in paradise since without bad groups of people there couldn’t be enormous populations of BAD PEOPLE, and everyone would love each other and live in perfect harmony; there wouldn’t be anything to fight about! Just like in that Beatles’ song “Imagine,” defined as the best-selling single of John Lennon’s solo career! The lyrics of that song encourage listeners to imagine a world of peace, without materialism, without borders separating nations, and without religion.

Of course, this concept completely ignores common sense and the entire history of human civilization, ignores the most natural human instincts such as private property ownership, competitiveness, healthy nationalism, capitalism, desire to protect your own people from strangers, etc. We will go back to this…

But let’s assume for a moment that Mark Zuckerberg simply wants us to BEHAVE in a civilized way and be nice and not use racial slurs, not threaten specific people, not incite violence — which sounds very rational and makes sense.

Unfortunately, Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t stop there — even though, at the beginning of his “community guidelines,” he specifically mentions that it is okay to criticize CONCEPTS and INSTITUTIONS, including using hate speech against them, at the END of his guidelines, he also bans content criticizing BOTH concepts and institutions if they could somehow be “associated with” very broad categories of protected groups of people. Zuckerberg bans:

•  Content attacking concepts, institutions, ideas, practices, or beliefs associated with protected characteristics, which are likely to contribute to imminent physical harm, intimidation, or discrimination against the people associated with that protected characteristic. Meta looks at a range of signs to determine whether there is a threat of harm in the content. These include but are not limited to: content that could incite imminent violence or intimidation; whether there is a period of heightened tension such as an election or ongoing conflict; and whether there is a recent history of violence against the targeted protected group. In some cases, we may also consider whether the speaker is a public figure or occupies a position of authority.

Essentially, we are not allowed to express our discontent with people, groups of people, and institutions that represent them!

Are there any “concepts” or “institutions” that could not be linked to “protected” groups if censors really want to link them together?

If you take government institutions, they are ALWAYS linked to “protected” groups — because government’s main function is to use legalized violence or threat thereof to ROB the “rich” and give the spoils to themselves and share some of it with parasites that live at the expense of taxpayers.

Therefore, by Mark Zuckerberg’s logic, you can’t criticize the government, and criticizing it is prohibited HATE SPEECH! Not only that, government bureaucracy is a BAD GROUP of people that usurps and abuses power at the expense of taxpayers and self-sufficient freedom-loving populations, and as such cannot be criticized on Facebook because it is a “GROUP” of people plus it is associated with the “protected” group of disadvantaged parasites milking the system. Plus, you can’t even criticize the concept of wealth redistribution by the government because it’s the concept associated with “protected” groups.

Some protected groups include occupation-based groups too! So you can’t go after government bureaucrats because it’s occupation; what about criminals? That is also an occupation, isn’t it? Or the homeless drug addict thugs? Occupation and identity?

Oh, wait, you can’t use demeaning language against inferior groups of people or call them inferior! What if they ARE inferior? Then what? What if they are disgusting, uncivilized, violent, and menacing, and numbers and statistics completely confirm that? You still have to pretend that they are nice? or just shut up?

Essentially, Mark Zuckerberg wants us to “PRETEND” that life is like the ‘IMAGINE” song ALREADY, and everyone around us is a wonderful, friendly, well-behaved human being wishing us well, and we MUST WANT to share everything we have with all of them without any back thoughts.

Can We Forgive Mark Zuckerberg and His Facebook?

In Mark Zuckerberg’s mind, if we JUST PRETEND, and stop talking and stop bitching about other people, all the evils in the world will be on their way out.

Mark wants us all to be docile, compliant with his moral standards, obedient to the authorities, naïve, trusting, generous, and share our world with others without screening them first.

Is he doing that in his personal life? Does it even matter if he does?

He has his particular vision of how the world should be and is using his power to change the world according to his beliefs or purported beliefs or some utopian ideas that he likes…

Let’s ask ourselves an honest question: “If I had as much power as Mark Zuckerberg and had half of his ambitions, wouldn’t I also want to use my powers tochange the world and human nature according to my own beliefs of how the world must work? I personally would! Wouldn’t you?

Of course, my beliefs are quite opposite to his, and I would use Facebook to fight against the establishment, against the bad institutions associated with so many bad groups of people that my new world would look a lot different from Mark’s imagined world.

I wish I had the same powers as Mark to do all that and play god, and maybe one day I will (probably when I get a little more senile and delusional) — but right now what we all have to deal with is Mark, not me.

And Mark’s naïve delusions based on another “dreamer’s” song “Imagine” threaten our existence! Yes, they do! I understand what you are trying to do, Mark, and would be happy to forgive you, BUT unfortunately, what you are doing threatens the existence of our country and our civilization, so before you seal my mouth with your “community guidelines,” please let me explain why!

How Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook Censorship Contributes to the Demise of Our World

So, first of all, we all know that you can’t change human nature—it hasn’t changed since the beginning of our civilization. Despite being social animals, we inherited territorial instinct from our animal ancestors, and the instinct of self-preservation. Both of those instincts drive our behavior more than anything else.

What makes us human is some degree of self-restraint, where for the sake of self-preservation, we somewhat limit our territorial instincts and say don’t try to invade our neighbor’s land because we know that he could shoot us if we trespass—we want more land, but self-preservation restrains us from grabbing it. Some of us envy rich people and want to rob them of what they have, but self-preservation dictates that if we try, maybe the police will catch us, and we will go to prison (not in LA or SF, but at least in some jurisdictions).

There is an interplay between being territorial, protecting your own property, trying to grab more property, and the self-preservation instinct that protects us from the risk of harm in pursuing territorial instinct. The same applies to some passionate young men trying to date another man’s wife; or leadership of one country from invading another, etc…

Ever since kindergarten, we want to protect our property—whether it’s a toy car that another toddler is trying to grab from us, or it’s our business that the government is trying to regulate into extinction, or our country that is being invaded by foreigners we don’t want to share our space with.

We only want to share with people we like—all other sharing, especially mandated by the government, is VIOLENCE that we resist by any accessible means.

Mark Zuckerberg knows about all this, but he doesn’t want us to talk about it and vent and criticize government policies that violate our territorial, property, or self-preservation rights.

Whether Mark believes that by silencing us he can change our behavior or he can make the world a better place is irrelevant because no matter how silent we are, we are not going to change our human nature.

On the contrary, if we are silenced and have no place to VENT even, let alone voice our legitimate grievances, we will get ANGRY. When enough people get angry enough, they organize resistance to those who silence them and such resistance inevitably leads to uncontrollable violence, revolutions, and chaos.

There is a reason why democracies outlasted authoritarian empires—that reason is FREEDOM OF SPEECH. When people have freedom of speech, they are LESS likely to engage in violence, not MORE likely to do it!

Right now, we are at a crossroads in history. Democrats are trying to install a socialist totalitarian government that uses government agencies to persecute the opposition, that suppresses freedom of speech, that doesn’t want people to be self-sufficient and instead wants them to be dependent on government benefits, getting their political support in exchange. Democrats are trying to expand government control over our lives, destroy independent capitalist economy, and follow the Chinese model where government and business merged under government control along with totalitarian control over the population. By enforcing his largely absurd “community guidelines” on Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg is stifling freedom of speech because all of the opposition speech under Mark’s community guidelines falls under “hate speech” definition—it criticizes the government and bad groups of people this government represents.

By suppressing freedom of speech on Facebook and Instagram, Mark Zuckerberg helps the socialist totalitarian regime to gain more power and to destroy our democracy and way of life. If democrats are successful in installing a socialist totalitarian regime, this country is NOT going to look like the world described in the song “IMAGINE” Mark Zuckerberg loves so much. On the contrary, the installation of a socialist totalitarian regime will lead to chaos, violence, and decay.

Americans are not Chinese—Americans don’t have the culture of obedience to authority, Chinese people with their imperial past and social hierarchy do. And yet, even in China, it took a bloody and lengthy civil war to install communism. Currently, despite full control over Chinese society and omnipotent surveillance and elimination of opposition, Chinese politburo is still worried about stability in society. Therefore, it is going out of its way to keep the economy strong, albeit with some serious setbacks. The more suppression of personal freedoms, especially when it comes to the middle class and business community, will happen in China, the less stable that society will be.

The United States was created in opposition to feudal tyranny, its entire existence is built on protest against tyranny (“no taxation without representation”), Americans could always freely speak their mind and immigrants who come here are also happy to be able to do this especially coming from authoritarian regime countries.

The entire American culture is built on freedom,freedom from government interference in our lives, freedom of speech, even freedom to bear arms which was specifically secured by the Second Amendment as the last resort against government tyranny when all else fails to stop it.

Essentially, our Constitution implies that violent armed rebellion against abusive government is still constitutional based on the right to bear arms when one party abuses checks and balances system and turns into a tyrannical regime.

Right-wing authoritarian regimes at least allow for a capitalist economy to prosper, supporting their relative longevity as compared to socialist totalitarian regimes that, on one hand, suppress all freedoms, and on the other, destroy the economy too.

Every single socialist society failed. Kamala, are you listening? Every one of them failed and brought devastation to the countries where socialist governments existed. We heard you say that you are a “capitalist,” but why should we believe you if you also keep demanding that businesses pay their “fair share,” you promise various benefits like house down payments, student debt forgiveness, family leave, etc. — at whose expense? All of your income redistribution schemes, Kamala, lead to socialism and the expansion of the government and high prices for consumers.

So, Mark — why are you helping Kamala? You are the epitome of a successful entrepreneur, you seem to be a believer in capitalism, why are you helping Kamala and suppressing free speech that criticizes her party? Kamala is just a façade, a third-rate bureaucrat that the Democrat Politburo is trying to install as “president,” but we all know that she will never be in charge — it’s always going to be the Democrat politburo that will dictate to her what to do.

By suppressing freedom of speech on Facebook, you, Mark, are essentially helping the socialist totalitarian politburo to win against the opposition that wants to save America from socialism and protect our freedoms. Therefore, we cannot forgive you! When something bad happens, you will bear part of the blame! If Democrats intimidated you or bullied you into helping them, you better say it now like you did when you revealed how they pressured you in 2020 to suppress truthful but negative information about the Biden family or Covid-related policies. If they bullied you or intimidated you, say it, and be brave like your “best friend and colleague Elon Musk,” who decided to stand up to the abusive system! Wake up, Mark, and stand side by side with Elon and help save this country and the world!

Please, before it’s too late, realize that human nature won’t allow “Imagine” to come to life! Sharing with others should only be voluntary! Maybe you are a dreamer and many of us are, but let’s not let our dreams destroy our reality!