Our local government’s years of reckless neglect and redistribution of resources to those unwilling to work finally and predictably culminated in an unspeakable tragedy for Los Angeles. Most of us know whose fault it is, but their obedient media is trying to mitigate the damage to self-serving bureaucracy and identity-based government mafia in power in the region.
Judging by the progressive media reaction to the LA fires, they are going out of their way to DISTRACT the angry population from the monumental failures of our local government AND TO COVER UP government negligence. The best way to do so is to invoke climate change. Climate change and global warming can explain everything away! It is not the homeless thugs who ignited the fire—it’s unusually strong wind that happened due to global warming. It is not Gavin Newsom and his legislative cronies who put in place regulations that limit water supply and who failed to build water aqueducts bringing water to the state—it is an unusual drought caused by fossil fuels that Gavin Newsom is fiercely fighting (while destroying our energy source along the way).
It is not the wrong allocation of plentiful California tax revenues to government bureaucracy and various “underserved” parasites that caused shortages of fire department resources—it is climate change caused by us! Maybe if we start driving electric cars, give up our gas stoves, and shrink our lives to fit into the delirious and nightmarish utopia of the Green activists, maybe then we will all of a sudden start living in a lush green paradise without fires, floods, hurricanes, etc. (all nasty weather being caused by human-made climate change, of course).
Moreover, these natural disasters are being conveniently used by special interests in the global warming business to their advantage: the more mainstream media emphasizes climate change as a cause of the disaster, the more taxpayer-funded government donations solar, wind, and electric car industries get; the more artificial, fake “green” jobs are created; and the more money flows to various self-serving government agencies like the EPA and self-serving nonprofits running on climate change hysteria.
Climate changed many times without human intervention, before humans existed and before progressive opportunists decided that climate change could help run a profitable business running on fear. No one could prove beyond reasonable doubt to what extent human activity contributes to global warming that supposedly causes natural disasters to intensify. If the climate is indeed changing, it will continue to change regardless of our efforts to stop it, and we just need to adjust to it instead of sacrificing our normal lives in hopes that we could stop the inevitable. It is naïve to think that government-mandated austerity would somehow save the world, especially knowing that overpopulation in underdeveloped nations and anti-woke policies in many other powerful nations that don’t buy into climate hysteria ideology would cancel out our “green” efforts regardless.
In any case, if our local LA and California governments truly believed in climate change creating unusually dangerous fire conditions, then these governments had even more responsibility to triple or quadruple investment in fire prevention and fire management measures instead of reducing expenditures on the fire department in favor of raising salaries for parasitic bureaucracy or increasing public services to those unwilling to work or those who should not be in the city or in the country in the first place. LA and CA governments should not be allowed to cover up their recklessness and wrongful priorities by pointing fingers at climate change!
COMPASSION FOR THE UNWORTHY BURNS OUR PRESENT AND KILLS OUR FUTURE
Two facts:
Most January 2025 LA fires (like most previous fires) are MAN-MADE. LA is home to over 80,000 homeless thugs and drug addicts, in addition to thousands of criminals who commit burglaries (and these categories overlap).
Also, LA has a dry climate with seasonal Santa Ana winds—not because of “global warming,” but because it’s ALWAYS been this way! Southern California’s climate has been dry for centuries.
If you add typical government neglect and wrong priorities into the mix, you get the apocalyptic Armageddon we are now experiencing.
Our county supervisors and city council constantly whine about being compassionate to the homeless and putting them in shelters. Our county supervisors and city council are more worried about the “cruel” criminalization of homelessness and mass incarceration than about safety for our residents and cleaning up LA. Normal Angelenos are not a priority for our local government—the homeless and the criminals are.
Who is to say that burglars didn’t ignite those fires to cause evacuation orders and loot businesses and homes? Who is to say that homeless thugs didn’t ignite fires while making meth or just for fun while under the influence of drugs? Normal people are careful and do not engage in arson—malicious people loiter the streets looking to cause trouble!
It should be an obvious, common-sense solution to REMOVE all 80,000 homeless zombies, mentally ill, and drug addicts FAR AWAY from our urban areas—so far away that they could not possibly come back on their own. We have plenty of space in the deserts of Eastern California for homeless encampments!
The U.S. Supreme Court has already allowed us to criminalize homelessness. Our local government refuses to. Why? Not only because they have a perverse sense of compassion for bad people generally, including but not limited to homeless thugs who hurt us and have zero redeeming value. Our local government has a clear self-interest in attracting and maintaining the homeless population because our city council and county supervisors are inextricably intertwined in the most corrupt ways with the entire “homelessness” industry. This industry feeds off taxpayer money to “help” the “unhoused”: construction companies that build “tiny homes” at exorbitant costs, the social worker mafia, the medical mafia that services Skid Row, both legal and illegal drug distribution businesses, various parasitic nonprofit organizations running shelters and servicing homeless thugs and drug addicts, and various social benefit program bureaucrats living off the homelessness issue as well!
If the homeless thug and drug addict population is removed from the city to desert camps, the entire corrupt homelessness business infrastructure will collapse, and many parasitic services for the homeless will lose income!
MAYBE they’ll make our fire chief a scapegoat; maybe they’ll even make Karen Bass a scapegoat, but the real decision-making belonged to city council members and county supervisors. It was them who approved the redistribution of services to parasites, it was them who refused to criminalize homelessness, and it was them who got rid of tough-on-crime Sheriff Villanueva to replace him with a docile and obedient Sheriff Luna! The problem is not just an incompetent mayor like Karen Bass but an entire system that consists of the city council, county supervisors, and other local elected officials that must be replaced by pro-business and effective professionals!
POPULATION PROBLEMS
Climate change enthusiasts forget that OVERPOPULATION, due to demographic explosions in Africa, the Middle East, Pakistan, India, and other developing nations, contributes to the miserable conditions of a greater share of humanity far more profoundly than climate change!
Because of overpopulation, people expand their habitat to dangerous areas unsuitable for humans to live in—they move to low-lying areas subject to floods, fire-prone areas, areas prone to mudslides, earthquakes, etc.
Even in developed nations like the U.S., why did insurance companies offer coverage to early Pacific Palisades residents who decided to settle in dry wilderness areas subject to seasonal droughts and fires? Why did the government allow people to build homes in Pacific Palisades in the first place?
Or in any other area subject to systematic fires and unsuitable for living, like the dry hills surrounding the San Fernando Valley (including canyons and dry hills covered with brush above Pasadena)?
Everyone knew this is a dry climate, subject to periodic fires—it’s not a surprise. So why not limit the areas where people are allowed to live to safer locations, where fires are unlikely because mountains and dry hills with dry brush are far away?
And if it so happened that people already built thriving neighborhoods in fire-prone areas, why not just clear the brush in advance to prevent fires? Why not make sure that homeless thugs stay out of the area and are unable to set fires? Why not bring in more water and keep reservoirs and hydrants full?
POPULATION EXCHANGE
Generally, population density brings all kinds of problems, including crime, poverty, urban decay, diseases, and bad government—so if, to maintain a low enough density, the Los Angeles County area could only allow for 3 million people instead of 10 million, there should not have been more construction allowed than that which would have accommodated no more than 3 million people.
The population of Pacific Palisades was hardly suffering from high crime rates, diseases, or urban decay, but it was forced to live in precarious terrain in large part because urban ghettos—a breeding ground for urban decay, crime, and poverty—occupy the safer areas of South Central and downtown since the 1960s!
- Before the 1960s, the white middle class lived in safer areas like downtown, East LA, South Central, Koreatown, etc., but white flight occurred due to the influx of minorities and migrants who didn’t belong to the middle class and were not law-abiding or civilized enough to be good neighbors.
- Had the newcomers belonged to the middle and upper class, their affiliation with the non-white population would not have mattered because the middle and upper class of all ethnicities share similar family values and civilized standards of behavior.
- However, the invasion of people who don’t look like you, don’t speak your language, and on top of it victimize you with their low-class behavior, criminality, noisiness, disrespect for personal boundaries, and your property—you naturally want to run!
Therefore, in the 1960s, the white middle class fled the central and South Central Los Angeles neighborhoods, trying to stay away from criminals, from uncivilized behavior by neighbors, from schools full of juvenile delinquents, from trashed streets, and from noisy, rowdy, disorderly neighbors!
- The white population of Los Angeles dropped from 93.4% in 1950 to 24.6% in 1980.
- The white share of the population in Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) schools dropped from 68% to a much lower percentage.
- The area left behind by white flight became disenfranchised.
- The schools left behind by white flight became segregated and underfunded.
This caused the historic core of LA, with its Victorian homes and comfortable terrain, to deteriorate and become a breeding ground for crime, poverty, urban decay, parasitic mentality, unions, and horrible socialist government.
Now, what we have is transients and criminals running around loose all over the city, including affluent areas, setting fires, looting stores, and burglarizing private homes of people who were forced to live in precarious terrain because “fire-proof” areas are unsafe due to crime and ghetto cesspool conditions.
The answer to this is rapid gentrification and pushing the uncivilized and criminally inclined ghetto population out of the city core to remote and desolate outskirts with potentially very affordable housing such as mobile home parks and manufactured homes—especially in the huge vacant spaces between Victorville and Barstow and between Barstow and Las Vegas.
Those who can adapt to gentrification and improve their behavior would be welcome to stay and rise to the level of newly arrived middle- and upper-class residents. Those unwilling to improve, become productive, civilized, respectful to neighbors, and law-abiding would have to leave.
Additionally, gentrification should not include building enormous projects with tiny rooms and apartment buildings that would still attract uncivilized, welfare-dependent, and drug-addicted populations. On the contrary, gentrification should include rebuilding historic homes and constructing new ones in the same historic style of the 19th century and Roaring 20s that still prevails in the historic core of LA.
Once the uncivilized, low-budget population is priced out or pushed out of the central parts of LA, it will hopefully be repopulated by a middle class of any ethnic background. More affluent residents of any ethnic background will gentrify the area, plant more shade-producing trees, remove trashy businesses and marijuana dispensaries, and maintain cleanliness and law and order in the streets after the removal of drug addicts, unhoused thugs, and criminals.
At the same time, the low-budget welfare-dependent and drug-addicted population removed from comfortable downtown and South Central cesspools into faraway desolate areas to the east, preferably desert-like climates, will be forced to fend for themselves or die out. As a result, those who were previously corrupted by government handouts will become self-sufficient, give up bad habits, build homes from scratch, get busy, and become normal and productive people improving their lives and building nice new communities—or die out!
SOLUTIONS:
- The government that has abused and neglected Los Angeles and California for the past 30 years must be completely replaced by officials espousing anti-progressive ideology that will represent business owners, homeowners, and taxpayers, and go after parasites at all levels. The new government will not hesitate to fire thousands of parasitic bureaucrats, reduce taxation and regulation, remove the homeless from the city limits, build new prisons for tens of thousands of criminals, and put them behind bars for decades with the help of tough-on-crime district attorneys, judges, and a doubled and unrestrained police force.
- The government’s priorities must change – environmental regulations must not create unsafe conditions or impose unsustainable restrictions on our lifestyle. The water supply to the region must increase dramatically by building multiple water canals to Southern California from water-rich regions. The fire department budget, fire prevention technology, fire-resistant home retrofitting, and fire department personnel must be significantly enhanced at the expense of welfare-addicted parasites, homeless thugs, and bureaucracy.
- The population must be exposed to anti-progressive, common-sense ideology to re-educate the so-called “educated” who have been brainwashed by the leftist education system and mainstream media. Once the population gives up its socialist liberal decadent mentality, it will elect a completely different city council and county supervisors and will support different priorities that provide safety and well-being to Los Angeles communities.
Leave A Comment