PRO-LIFE HYSTERIA

Unwanted Birth Prevention

Putting aside religious arguments against abortion not to offend anyone’s religious feelings, we will focus on the emotional side of this. Pro-lifers tend to display posters with aborted fetuses covered in blood, blame mothers for murdering their unborn children, and focus on the immorality of preventing human life from happening.

Of course, for many pro-lifers, it’s a matter of religious belief too, and for some, just a matter of tradition. For example, in the Latino community (especially among newly arrived undocumented migrants but even among those born and raised in the U.S.), it’s just not a commonly accepted practice to use condoms and contraceptives and then terminate pregnancies. The Latino community by and large believes that everything should happen naturally: young people fall in love, sexual attraction happens, they have sex when they want to, and then if a girl gets pregnant, so be it—she feels morally obligated to give birth to that child but more frequently wants to raise the child. Simple and natural. The fact that maybe that child wasn’t planned or the young couple didn’t get married and didn’t plan to before having sex or that the father of the child is gone right after intercourse—okay, maybe a few days after—is not so important to them; these circumstances are natural—people are not being forced to do something they don’t want to do and are not restrained from something they want to do! Very simple and in many ways practical philosophy that is making everyone responsible for their actions. “Hey, girl – you’ve given access to your reproductive organ to this boy you are attracted to, you enjoyed intercourse with him, so you assumed the risk of producing a kid!” (obviously with exceptions of rape and incest). Girls assume the risk that their sexual partner will disappear from view tomorrow and go back to Honduras and they won’t find him there anymore, and good luck trying to get child support! In cases like this, young women assume a lot more risk than young men. Of course, these “accidental” kids often become a major burden for the taxpayer community as a result, and so it is a taxpayer voter’s responsibility to vote for government officials that promote contraception and abortion among the young generation of Latinos to prevent the unwanted children from becoming a burden for society.

Those young men who can’t escape their paternal responsibilities in Honduras, and have legitimate social security numbers and jobs in the U.S.—they also assume the risk that the mother of their child will go after them for child support even if this young man never planned to have a kid and this was one of those one-night-stand type of adventures between the two.

Therefore, typically both young would-be parents assume the risk of unwanted childbirth, and of course, the young woman may be disproportionately affected by needing to raise this unwanted child without much help from the deadbeat daddy, but still, both knew what they were doing and both suffer the consequences. Actually, even the deadbeat daddy may occasionally be hit with the child support; he also may get more mature with age and realize that he lost an opportunity to bond with his biological child, missed out on some important human experience, and feel terrible about it in his later years…

However, all this “drama” appears to be natural—not political, it’s just human; and it teaches the other girls and boys of all races and backgrounds that perhaps they should restrain themselves sometimes to avoid negative consequences of random sex, or maybe they should force themselves to wear a condom, or maybe they should use other contraceptives, etc…

These situations happen in all communities, but in the Latino community, it seems that the attitudes toward this abortionless lifestyle are more mature because normally the Latino community, to its credit, is reluctant to rely on the government for help and prefers self-reliance—you messed up, face the consequences; or don’t mess up in the first place. Also, a profound well-deserved stigma is attached to those who make kids just to be a parasite off the welfare system are not viewed favorably, and being a public charge is considered to be shameful as it should be. In this case, the Black community could learn a lot from Latinos not to demand or rely on government handouts and become more self-sufficient! On the other hand, young Black women tend to act more responsibly when it comes to abortions—their abortion rates are much higher than those of young Latino women. The same applies to young white women—their abortion rates are also higher than those among Latino women.

As far as the institution of marriage is concerned, there is a reason why many Latinos never get married and prefer “union libre” too—if they already had sex, then marriage is not pure to them (per Catholic tradition) and therefore is unnecessary—so on top of a mature attitude to childbirth, there is a mature attitude to marriage—and with “union libre” many Latino couples save themselves from ugly divorce dramas some of their white counterparts tend to get into.

Even when married and separated, Latinos rarely hire divorce lawyers to engage in prolonged and ugly property division, child custody, or spousal support litigation. Men often just leave the house and start a new life somewhere and don’t bother to even file for divorce, and women don’t bother to do it either—just start their new life…

So compared to the mature attitude to assumption of risk by young women in the Latino community and other similar groups, this pro-life drama seems very unnatural—people who don’t have a personal stake in some abstract woman’s body and never meet those unborn kids all of a sudden are so pre-occupied with the well-being of those fetuses that they are willing to do anything it takes to deny women the right to do whatever they want with their bodies. Emotions matter when you personally have a stake in what’s happening—feeling empathy for unborn strangers is not healthy and requires some mental counseling.

PRO-CHOICE POLITICS

Naturally, for pro-choice Democrats, this is an ideal political win—everywhere, even in red states! Most women, even if they are not hardcore liberal activists, feel that it should be their personal choice to have as many kids as they want or have none at all, and at the same time also be free to have sex without a condom and not use abortion pills if they don’t want to. If their boyfriend or husband doesn’t want a kid, then he should also take some precautions, condoms, vasectomy, etc… So women of childbearing age (unless women voters are hardcore conservatives) are forced to vote Democrat only because they want to keep their personal freedom to make baby decisions without government interference. Many suburban women of childbearing age are concerned about crime, concerned about the influx of undocumented immigrants into their communities, concerned about anti-business taxation and regulation, and inflation and high prices (all weak spots for Dems), but when these women imagine a horror scenario where they’ll be forced to raise a child instead of enjoying their life and benefiting from their career, they reluctantly choose their personal freedom over other concerns and vote pro-choice Democrat. It is interesting how Democrats can be very oppressive when it comes to certain personal freedoms but not other ones: Democrats don’t want people to be armed for self-defense even in crime-infested urban areas and want to censor speech online when it’s the opposition’s speech; Democrats welcome more government control limiting our personal freedoms, but they are vehemently opposed to restrictions on abortion or criminalization of drugs—go figure! Democrats are all pro-#metoo movement but they deny mature women over 18 personal freedom to date men for money or date older men or date their bosses without penalty for those men who #metoo activists erroneously believe “exploit” those women sexually. This #“metoo” witch hunts happen even when women “want” to be “exploited” and want to make these personal freedom decisions on their own without shaming by activists!. With all these inconsistencies, however, Democrats are aligned with common sense when it comes to abortion.

Pro-choice makes a lot more sense not only to the majority of women but to the majority of the population in general—all opinion polls suggest that! And obviously when Republicans start pushing through abortion restrictions, they face fierce opposition from the majority of voters and lose winnable elections!

This should have been a no-brainer for any Republican politician or a political strategist—just be pro-choice; or, worst-case scenario, if you are stuck with some extremely conservative constituency, explain to them: “because of you, guys, we lose elections! I can advocate abortion restrictions all I want, but the majority of the population is against you on this issue! We can’t win this! Focus on fighting against socialism, against big government tyranny, against affirmative action, against open borders, against crime—winning issues, important issues—forget about a loser abortion issue!” This is in fact a big failure of Republican politicians who are unwilling to educate their most conservative constituency, and guide them instead of just blindly following them to another electoral loss! It is also a failure of Republican Supreme Court judges overturning Roe vs. Wade—yes, in effect that decision just returned the decision-making process about abortion to state legislatures, but it caused a political firestorm against Republicans and messed up their midterms and continues ruining Republican electability.

Conversely, this is a tremendous success for competent Democrat politicians who can win elections by taking advantage of abortion rights incompetency of their Republican counterparts. And that’s despite the fact that Democrats lose on the economy, on border, on crime, and many other issues that would have mattered more than abortion to women voters but for dreaded abortion restrictions.

PERSONAL FREEDOM

Just like we all should have the right to protect ourselves from violent criminals by carrying firearms in public and keeping them at home, women should have personal freedom over their bodies preferably with would-be fathers’ participation (if appropriate).

What to do with another person forming inside a female body should not concern strangers—it should be a deeply personal and delicate matter for would-be parents to manage one way or another. For a pregnant woman to terminate a pregnancy is a very difficult emotionally charged decision that normally happens for a good reason. If she acted irresponsibly at some point and had given access to her sexual organs to a guy who didn’t have serious intentions, a woman has to suffer more serious consequences than that guy either way—performing an abortion or having to raise the child alone.

So obviously, a would-be mother has the most stake in this decision-making process, not some psychotic stranger standing outside the abortion clinic harassing or threatening obstetricians with bloody fetus posters…

Personal freedom and the rights of an individual who has the most stake in a particular situation should prevail over some other individual’s personal views about that situation.

DEMOGRAPHICS

Of course, we are undergoing a demographic catastrophe—especially white people who seek the majority of abortions (with Black women following them in second place and often having even higher abortion rates than white women!). Unlike all other racial groups, white people are disappearing from the planet not because of being replaced by immigrants, but because of extremely low birth rates among white populations in all countries where they live. Japanese people are also undergoing a demographic catastrophe, China is about to as well, and some other developed countries.

However, banning abortions won’t help to motivate white women or Chinese women or Japanese women to make more babies and won’t encourage white men, Chinese men, or Japanese men to want kids (actually quite the opposite!). Banning abortion may result in more unwanted babies born into the world. Unwanted babies won’t be raised by loving parents and won’t develop into high-quality human beings—unwanted babies more likely than not will grow up angry, violent, bitter, anti-social, and unmotivated to succeed in life. Unwanted children will be a burden for the social benefits safety net, because single mothers will be unable or unwilling to provide for them. Unwanted children will have behavioral problems that will result in dealing with the criminal justice system and social worker abuses including foster home problems.

Law-abiding taxpayers suffer the most from the presence of unwanted children in society: taxpayers have to pay for unwanted children’s schooling, support them financially because deadbeat dads are nowhere to be found, taxpayers will suffer from burglaries and robberies committed by grown-up unwanted children, and deal on a daily basis with an uncivilized, criminally inclined, unmotivated, and often drug-addicted parasite class made up mostly of grown-up unwanted children. This is the case because most abortions are performed by low-budget urban ghetto or trailer park women who, if not allowed to abort, will produce and raise defective people causing harm to society. If anything, those “underprivileged” women who engaged in irresponsible intercourse with low-budget and low-class men and got pregnant and are now seeking an abortion are trying to help themselves and help society to avoid challenges of dealing with the unwanted people! So, idiots who are not letting them perform abortion are, in fact, not only harming these women and subjecting children’s fathers to child support and other child-related challenges but are subjecting us all to dealing with unwanted children who live at our expense, become criminals, drug addicts, and often ruin the quality of life in good neighborhoods! Forcibly producing low-quality people won’t save us from the demographic catastrophe; it will only cause more devastation!

If the demographic catastrophe among the white population will finally be considered a national crisis and the disappearing white population wants to survive as a race, our society needs to make sure that white men and women are motivated to have more children, that they are financially and emotionally ready to raise quality human beings, and that their careers do not get in the way of child-rearing responsibilities. Making a priority out of saving disappearing ethnic groups like Native Americans, white people, or Japanese people should be a conscious choice for society and not considered some sort of racist idea. At the same time, the government should not penalize consumers and employers by allowing 1-year maternity and paternity leave benefits or forcing employers to allow young parents to work 3 days a week while getting paid for 5 days a week—because this would probably be a wrong solution offered by pro-labor groups that want to encourage childbirth among the disappearing white population.

Perhaps, grandparents and extended family could be required to be involved in child-raising, and one of the parents by mutual agreement could take primary responsibility to be with the child; babysitter and caretaker options should be on the table, but definitely, these matters could be decided within the family without government interference as long as both parents are motivated to produce children.

For non-white populations that are not disappearing as a race, it is just as important, if not more important, than for white people to produce only wanted children, and have proper conditions for raising healthy, happy, and productive human beings. If the white race continues to disappear at this pace regardless of all efforts to save it (none are made so far)—then someone else has to replace white people

as civilized, productive, and intelligent successors to Western civilization. If high-quality non-white individuals are too small in numbers compared to billions of underdeveloped and defective low-budget ghetto populations all over the world, human civilization is doomed. Even within the U.S., we want people of all racial backgrounds to believe in self-eugenics, in improving themselves, producing higher-quality generations than the ones that came before so that there would be more harmony in society and in each person’s life. To achieve that, we don’t want anyone to have unwanted kids, and we want all kids who are actually born to be raised by self-sufficient, civilized, happy parents who have a lot to give to them to make them be the best versions of themselves.

SUMMARY

PRO-LIFE is bad for women, PRO-LIFE is bad for politics, PRO-LIFE is bad for taxpayers, PRO-LIFE is even bad for demographics—if you are a pro-life activist, let that irresponsible, feticidal woman feel remorseful and depressed about abortion; you don’t have to feel bleeding-heart remorseful for her! Do you want to have personal freedom to carry your gun in some crime-infested urban ghetto or be ready to kill the intruder in your own house with an AR-15? Then respect a woman’s personal freedom not to produce an unwanted parasite baby who will later on live off your taxes and intrude into your suburban paradise or try to rob you in the mean streets of our urban shitholes! PRO-CHOICE is a winner for everyone: for fetuses who don’t want to grow up in misery and be bitter all their future lives; for would-be parents who don’t want unnecessary burdens of child-raising to destroy their lives; for taxpayers, for safety, for the social safety net, for demographics to improve the quality of the population, even for Republicans to win more elections! Go Pro-Choice!